In our second June meeting, we’ll move from noticing to using: how we metabolize countertransference ethically, how we bring it to supervision/consultation, and how we decide when (and how) to name relational dynamics in the room. We’ll also focus on repair—because even with the best intentions, misattunements happen. Repair is often where the work becomes most healing (and where we need the most skill).

Bring a case, a stuck point, or a moment you keep replaying—something that felt confusing, charged, avoidant, over-responsible, or ethically complex. That’s usually the doorway.

Come with one question:

• What feels challenging, confusing, or ethically complex about working with these dynamics?

• What support (skill, boundary, consultation, personal insight) would strengthen your confidence in navigating and repairing relational ruptures?